[ 1. Your shorter gear ratios increase your acceleration compared to the 130hp Polo Therefore your 134 hp are easily sufficient for a better acceleration. Not true - this has been tested. 1-2-3 = same my 4th = a bit longer My 5th is a little bit shorter than his 6th (not a lot!) @ 200km/h i have 40...

Ulf: This is an example of someone (Toledo - heavy tuned) who has been to the same dyno centre as me (so same "testing bank"). You will see - with him, it also gets "smaller" in the end, so same style like me http://users.pandora.be/zidox/mitch.jpg For your information: the "testing bank" from Me + ...

Look at red circle At the end point of a measuring it is normal that all lines go down to Zero and melt together. But in your Diagram the difference between "WheelPower" and "EnginePower" decreases long before the the end point of the measuring. Therefore the names of the lines simply must be wrong...

Oh yeah and by the way:

The loss from DINEng to DINWhp is in all of the 3 curves (almost perfectly) the same

Of the Passat: 170,7 ps to 150,9 ps = 8,8 %

Of the Golf: 167,1 ps to 148,9 ps = 8,9 %

Of me (Polo): 157,1 ps to 134,3 ps = 8,5 %

So all of these are between 8,5 - 9 % ..

Wouter.

In den Diagrammen von Golf und Passat schrumpft die Differenz zwischen Rad- und Motorleistung im obersten Drehzahlbereich nicht wieder zusammen.

Jawohl

Look at red circle

Ulf: so you believe the diagram from the 167PS one ? What (big) difference is there then with mine ? I'm curious.. Because except from a bit different output (158 to 167 and 395 to 365) I don't see much difference in these 2 dyno runs, you can really see in the "style" they are from the same tuner.....

Von der Golf

1.9 PD TDI 100 PS / 240 NM @ 167 PS / 365 Nm

You made me laugh there Sealevel ? Lol.

You will always have loss from engine to wheels.. this percentage of loss is perfectly normal mate.

ich nehme auch mal ganz stark an das das Diagramm auch von dem Chip-Tuner stammt Sowas sagt mir dann schon alles :-? Möchte ja gerne noch mehr verkaufen ;) Nein Diagramm / test "bank" ist nich von tuner.. Tuning ist in Niederlande gemacht, die diagramm in Belgien. @ Ulf: I didn't understand a lot o...

ulf: nicht richting Hab schon getestet und ich bin schneller wie ein Polo TDI 130 PS (original) Auch in "sprint" bin ich wie schnell wie ein Audi A3 2.0 TDI obd tuned to 185 PS / 400Nm In english: The scales of your dyno result are different LOL. This is "apfels" mit "pferren" vergleichen :cheesy: P...

:D :D :D :D You can stay sceptic about it - I understand. But trust me this tuner knows what he's doing ;-) He tuned many AXR's with (+-) this software with (+-) the same output in ps/nm.. Not even one AXR with this software has had problems yet! Just one guy, who has to change his clutch/kuppplung....

Yes i have ATD...but how could you decide if you want Atd or AXR type...i dont recall tha tsomeone was asking me about the types of motor? You can't "choose" it ;) . ATD has been made for a few years (A few 9N's have an ATD, some are AXR). And as far as I know, all 9n3's (so from 2005) are AXR.. I ...

Mein deutsch ist nicht sehr gut, so english There are 2 type of 1.9 PD TDI 100 PS engines. One with motorcode AXR and one with ATD. 1.9 PD TDI 100 PS (ATD) with custom chip/OBD-tuning -> +- 145ps 320 Nm 1.9 PD TDI 100 PS (AXR) with custom chip/OBD-tuning -> +- 160ps 350 + Nm AXR is better than ATD, ...

Mein Polo mit chip

Hallo mein deutsch ist nicht sehr gut aber. Ich hab ein Polo 9n3 100pk (motorcode axr) und hab ca. 160ps und 350Nm mit allein obd tuning. Ich bin schneller wie ein original polo 130pk ;) Kein russ austoss, und motor dreht sehr gut/ruhig, schon einige tausenden km's ! Mit "sprint" mit ein audi a3 2.0...